Details of Award
NERC Reference : NE/N017935/1
Using data to compare the health impact of mobility infrastructure in cities (just what the doctor ordered)
Grant Award
- Principal Investigator:
- Professor N Tyler, University College London, Civil Environmental and Geomatic Eng
- Grant held at:
- University College London, Civil Environmental and Geomatic Eng
- Science Area:
- Atmospheric
- Earth
- Freshwater
- Marine
- Terrestrial
- Overall Classification:
- Unknown
- ENRIs:
- Global Change
- Science Topics:
- Transport Planning
- Transport Ops & Management
- Urban & Land Management
- Abstract:
- This research looks to exploring the appropriate model and methodology for a scenario appraisal tool which will utilize data to assess mobility infrastructure designs in relation to health benefits in developed countries. This will be achieved by testing the emerging model and methodology on several case study sites in different countries. There are three stages: 1. Benchmarking / 'check up' Existing site area / mobility infrastructure will be assessed according to BRE's emerging Healthy Cities Index indicators and compared to current performance across the city and in other similar cities worldwide 2. Opportunities and constraints assessment / 'diagnostics' Options for alternative mobility infrastructure and potential constraints are identified and compared with local priorities and easy-wins. - 3. Design testing / 'prognosis' New design proposals can be tested against the base case (i.e. existing site area) and assessed using the same defined indicators / measures for health and other benefits. We propose the following methodology and research stages (see excel spreadsheet): 1. General overview / trends on mobility infrastructure and health 2. Definition of key relationships between health benefits and mobility infrastructure with reference to co-benefits across other social, economic and environmental considerations. 3. Selection of existing best practice studies with regards to mobility infrastructure and the benefits identified in the previous phase. 4. Identify measures and indicators for enabling the scenario's benchmarking purposes and identification of opportunities / constraints. 5. Analysis / review of existing tools / methodology - this includes identifying existing tools / methodologies, gaps / opportunities and the market. 6. Analysis / review of data - this includes existing data, data gaps and data requirements and quality. 7. Development of the methodology to enable the scenario tool development at the three stages of benchmarking (check-up), identifying opportunities / constraints (diagnosis) and testing scenarios (surgery). 8. Testing the methodology using existing and available software and tools on one or two project test case studies - 'proof of concept'. 9. Research / Technical reporting 10. Communicating research: development of marketing material and dissemination internally and externally
- NERC Reference:
- NE/N017935/1
- Grant Stage:
- Completed
- Scheme:
- Innovation
- Grant Status:
- Closed
- Programme:
- Innovation - SPs
This grant award has a total value of £24,959
FDAB - Financial Details (Award breakdown by headings)
| Indirect - Indirect Costs | DA - Investigators | DI - Staff | DA - Estate Costs |
|---|---|---|---|
| £8,884 | £5,719 | £7,233 | £3,124 |
If you need further help, please read the user guide.