Details of Award
NERC Reference : NE/I004718/1
Understanding and Managing Watershed Services in Andean and Amazonian Catchments
Grant Award
- Principal Investigator:
- Dr J Budds, The Open University, Faculty of Social Sciences
- Co-Investigator:
- Professor W Buytaert, Imperial College London, Civil & Environmental Engineering
- Co-Investigator:
- Professor R Boelens, Wageningen University, Irrigation and Water Enginering Group
- Co-Investigator:
- Dr PT Robbins, The Open University, Faculty of Sci, Tech, Eng & Maths (STEM)
- Co-Investigator:
- Dr M Gillman, The Open University, Faculty of Sci, Tech, Eng & Maths (STEM)
- Co-Investigator:
- Dr WD Gosling, University of Amsterdam, Biodiversity & Ecosystem Dynamics
- Co-Investigator:
- Professor HE Johnson, The Open University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sci (FASS)
- Co-Investigator:
- Professor M Zwarteveen, IHE Delft Foundation, Research
- Grant held at:
- The Open University, Faculty of Social Sciences
- Science Area:
- Freshwater
- Overall Classification:
- Freshwater
- ENRIs:
- Pollution and Waste
- Natural Resource Management
- Global Change
- Environmental Risks and Hazards
- Biodiversity
- Science Topics:
- Water Quality
- Ecosystem Scale Processes
- Hydrological Processes
- Climate & Climate Change
- Abstract:
- Andean countries face major challenges in meeting demand for water among different sectors, while making water available for low-income groups and conservation needs. In Peru, Ecuador, Colombia and Bolivia, the recognition, management and valuation of the watershed services that support ecosystems and people has been weak. Yet, assuring the supply of water for these demands by improving watershed management has become increasingly important, especially in the context of climate variability and the growth of agribusiness and mining. Payment for Environmental Services (PES) schemes have become a popular policy strategy for assuring the supply of water in Andean countries. They are often supported because they enable low-income communities living in upstream areas to increase their incomes by 'selling' healthy watershed services to downstream users, such as water utilities and industries. For example, in Ecuador, water utilities pay campesinos [peasant smallholders] with land near their drinking water sources to not use fertilizer or pesticide, or to leave their land fallow, so as not to pollute rivers. PES schemes are based on important assumptions about the behaviour of ecosystems and people, and their interactions. For example, it is widely thought that preventing deforestation upstream will protect water flows downstream, and many PES schemes are based on this relationship. However, this does not apply to all conditions, as sometimes deforestation can increase water flow. A further problem in Andean countries is that little is known about their native ecosystems, and there is very little data available to improve our understanding of them. These assumptions about the relationships between ecological processes and human activity are also often over-simplified. This type of approach is problematic because it pays little attention to wider political and economic factors that shape resource use at the local level. This often results in low-income people being held responsible for environmental degradation, and policies that are based on these inaccurate understandings (such as planting trees in headwaters in the high Andes) can damage ecosystems and jeopardise poor people's livelihoods. More importantly, PES schemes fail to consider the rules and institutions that campesino and indigenous groups already have in place to manage their water sources and environments. These comprise local knowledge, forms of community organisation, customs and values, that these groups use in their everyday lives. These existing institutions and practices cannot simply be erased, and so it is important to consider them when designing PES initiatives, rather than looking to override them. In order to analyse these key assumptions about watershed services in Andean and Amazonian catchments, and to be able to assess the appropriateness of PES schemes for places inhabited by low-income campesino and indigenous peoples, the key research question for this project is: How are the ecological and social dynamics of watershed services in Andean and Amazonian catchments understood and managed by different actors (scientists, policymakers, communities)? By asking this question, we seek to better understand how watershed processes function in landscapes that are shaped by both ecological and social dynamics; to get insights into the ways in which understandings of watershed processes - both scientific and local - influence traditional management and PES schemes; and to analyse how these perspectives and practices could contribute to equitable watershed management in Andean countries.
- Period of Award:
- 1 Aug 2010 - 31 Jan 2011
- Value:
- £28,481 Lead Split Award
Authorised funds only
- NERC Reference:
- NE/I004718/1
- Grant Stage:
- Completed
- Scheme:
- Directed (Research Programmes)
- Grant Status:
- Closed
- Programme:
- ESPA PPD
This grant award has a total value of £28,481
FDAB - Financial Details (Award breakdown by headings)
| Exception - Other Costs | Indirect - Indirect Costs | DA - Investigators | DA - Estate Costs | DI - T&S |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| £9,680 | £5,858 | £7,582 | £1,218 | £4,144 |
If you need further help, please read the user guide.