Details of Award

NERC Reference : NE/H00534X/1

◀ Back to previous page

The effect of chemical alteration on the fidelity of palaeomagnetic pseudo-single-domain recorders

Grant Award

Principal Investigator:: Professor AR Muxworthy, Imperial College London, Earth Science and Engineering
Grant held at:: Imperial College London, Earth Science and Engineering

Science Area:: Earth
Overall Classification:: Earth

Science Classification details

ENRIs:: Global Change
Science Topics:: Earth Surface Processes; Volcanic Processes; Properties Of Earth Materials; Mantle & Core Processes

Abstract:: Our understanding of the Earth's core, its formation and the geodynamo on geological timescales is derived from palaeomagnetic studies. Similarly, palaeomagnetic data plays a key role in the fields of palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, tectonics, volcanology and many other geological areas. These studies rely on the ability of a rock's constituent magnetic minerals to record a meaningful and decipherable magnetic remanence. To reliably interpret palaeomagnetic data we need to understand the mechanisms that induce magnetic remanence and can subsequently alter it. Whilst some mechanisms, e.g., thermoremanent magnetisation (TRM) acquisition, are well understood, there is a broad class of remanence acquiring or altering mechanisms termed chemical (or crystallisation) remanent magnetisation (CRM) or chemical alteration, that are poorly understand yet are frequent in nature and so commonly contribute to palaeomagnetic observations. CRM refers to any process that physically or chemically alters the magnetic minerals of a rock. It can take many forms, for example: (1) it can be a remanence induced and retained in magnetic grains as they grow at ambient temperature, i.e. a growth CRM, or (2) it can be the resultant change in a mineral's magnetic remanence as it chemically alters through oxidation or reduction, where the new phase can be either magnetically stronger or weaker. The problem is further complicated in that it is often difficult to distinguish between say a TRM and CRM, yet the origin and interpretation of the two remanence signals is completely different. For example, if the ancient geomagnetic field intensity (palaeointensity) is a growth CRM yet wrongly assumed to be a TRM in origin, this will lead to an over-estimate of the ancient geomagnetic field strength. Theoretical treatment of CRM and chemical alteration has been limited due to the broadness and complexity of the problem, and the difficulty in quantifying these processes experimentally. Theoretical models only exist for the smallest magnetic grains, termed single domain (SD) as their magnetisation is uniform. Larger grains have complex domain patterns and are termed multidomain (MD); small MD grains just above the SD threshold size tend display some SD characteristics and are termed pseudo-SD (PSD). Such PSD grains tend to dominate the signal of rocks, yet no rigorous theoretical understanding exists for PSD CRM. The aim of this proposal is to apply state-of-the-art experimental and numerical techniques to the understanding and quantification of the CRM and chemical alteration processes in SD and PSD samples. We will employ the latest advanced transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques including electron holography that allows us to image magnetisation on atomic scales in real-time as the minerals alter under controlled oxidising/reducing atmospheres. To link the TEM images to the bulk magnetic properties we will use our recently developed multiphase micromagnetic models, allowing us to relate nanometre sized chemical changes to the magnetic mineralogy to the measured bulk magnetic properties. We will quantify how different types of chemical alteration affect both palaeo-directional and palaeointensity information. In particular we will examine experimentally and numerically: (1) grain growth/dissolution and (2) low-temperature oxidation, e.g., the oxidation of titanomagnetite to titanomaghemite at temperatures < 150 C.

Period of Award:: 16 Aug 2010 - 30 Nov 2013
Value:: £299,779 Lead Split Award

(FY details)

Authorised funds only

NERC Reference:: NE/H00534X/1
Grant Stage:: Completed
Scheme:: Standard Grant (FEC)
Grant Status:: Closed
Programme:: Standard Grant

This grant award has a total value of £299,779

▲ top of page

FDAB - Financial Details (Award breakdown by headings)

DI - Other Costs	Indirect - Indirect Costs	DA - Investigators	DA - Estate Costs	DI - Staff	DI - T&S	DA - Other Directly Allocated
£32,408	£109,734	£3,751	£38,225	£102,645	£8,967	£4,046

If you need further help, please read the user guide.