This site is using cookies to collect anonymous visitor statistics and enhance the user experience.  OK | Find out more

Skip to content
Natural Environment Research Council
Grants on the Web - Return to homepage Logo

Details of Award

NERC Reference : NE/G006822/1

Adaptive suppression of subordinate reproduction in cooperative mammals

Grant Award

Principal Investigator:
Professor TH Clutton-Brock, University of Cambridge, Zoology
Science Area:
Terrestrial
Overall Classification:
Terrestrial
ENRIs:
Pollution and Waste
Natural Resource Management
Global Change
Environmental Risks and Hazards
Biodiversity
Science Topics:
Population Ecology
Conservation Ecology
Behavioural Ecology
Population Genetics/Evolution
Abstract:
In many animals that breed cooperatively, one dominant female in each group effectively monopolises reproduction and other females help to rear her offspring. However, in most animal societies, subordinate females sometimes breed and, in a few species, most mature females breed regularly. Understanding the reasons for these contrasts and the behavioural and physiological mechanisms controlling the distribution of reproduction among females and the degree of reproductive skew is of central importance in explaining the evolution of cooperation, the reproductive strategies of individuals and the population dynamics of cooperative breeders. However, although variation in reproductive skew has been the focus of considerable research in behavioural ecology for more than twenty years, it has not yet been possible to account for the distribution of subordinate breeding either between or within species. Previous attempts to explain the frequency of breeding by subordinates have either assumed that subordinate females breed where dominant females grant them reproductive concessions to ensure that they remain in the group and assist in rearing their offspring or that subordinates breed where dominants are incapable of preventing them from conceiving or rearing young. An alternative possibility, which has received relatively little attention, is that suppressing or evicting subordinate females has substantial costs to the fitness of dominants (partly because subordinate females are commonly their daughters or sisters and partly because the breeding success of dominants depends on the number of resident helpers) and that differences in the frequency of subordinate breeding are a consequence of variation in the net benefits of suppressing subordinates to dominants. While some correlational evidence suggests that this may be the case, no studies have yet measured the costs of subordinate breeding to dominant females or have determined whether variation in the net benefits of suppressing subordinates affects the frequency with which subordinates breed or are evicted from the group by dominants. By far the best way to investigate the ultimate and proximate mechanisms controlling reproductive skew is to manipulate the frequency of breeding by subordinates and dominants and to determine how this affects the breeding success of dominants and their treatment of subordinates. Drawing on an existing study population of Kalahari meerkats Suricta suricatta, where all individuals are recognisable and detailed records of individual differences in growth and breeding success are available for multiple groups over fifteen years, we shall use a combination of quantitative comparisons and experiments manipulating the frequency of reproduction by subordinates and dominants, to (1) measure the costs of subordinate breeding to dominants (2) determine whether variation in the net benefits of suppressing subordinates to dominants affects the extent to which they tolerate subordinates (3) determine whether dominants monitor the growth of subordinates and selectively evict likely challengers from the group (4) determine whether dominants attempt to influence the identity of their likely successors (5) develop generalised game-theory models that can be used to predict the extent to which dominants tolerate subordinates, the degree of reproductive skew and the size and structure of groups in other social vertebrates.
Period of Award:
1 Nov 2009 - 31 Jul 2013
Value:
£446,007 Lead Split Award
Authorised funds only
NERC Reference:
NE/G006822/1
Grant Stage:
Completed
Scheme:
Standard Grant (FEC)
Grant Status:
Closed
Programme:
Standard Grant

This grant award has a total value of £446,007  

top of page


FDAB - Financial Details (Award breakdown by headings)

DI - Other CostsIndirect - Indirect CostsDA - InvestigatorsDA - Estate CostsDI - StaffDA - Other Directly AllocatedDI - T&S
£98,384£93,630£36,222£36,104£138,822£14,188£28,657

If you need further help, please read the user guide.