Details of Award
NERC Reference : NE/E00475X/1
How did Earth's Mantle Become Oxidized? The Role of Perovskite Crystal Chemistry in Earth's Evolution
Grant Award
- Principal Investigator:
- Professor M Walter, University of Bristol, Earth Sciences
- Grant held at:
- University of Bristol, Earth Sciences
- Science Area:
- Earth
- Overall Classification:
- Earth
- ENRIs:
- Global Change
- Science Topics:
- Properties Of Earth Materials
- Mantle & Core Processes
- Abstract:
- The oxygen content of Earth was established during its accretion from planetesimals and planetary embryos some 4.5 billion years ago. Earth's iron metal core formed simultaneously with accretion, and stripped the silicate mantle of most of it iron. When the core was last equilibrated with the mantle, it must have done so at conditions that permit metal iron to be stable with silicate, and so we would expect all the iron in the mantle to occur as FeO (iron in a divalent oxidation state). However, Earth's upper mantle is much more oxidizing than this, such that it could not have equilibrated with the core. Interestingly, the upper mantle apparently obtained its oxidized state as far back as the Archean (~ 4 billion years), and this implies a link with primordial processes. The mantle oxidation state is a longstanding geochemical enigma, the solution to which has important implications for how the Earth formed and evolved. Most previous models for mantle oxidation enlist the composition of accreting materials. For example, perhaps late-stage materials were much more oxidizing than in early stages when the bulk of the core formed. Or perhaps hydrogen in accreting materials reacted with iron and oxidized the mantle. Both these scenarios are basically impossible to test because we cannot trace the origin of the materials that accreted to form Earth. Recently, a new and testable mechanism has been promoted. The mineral Mg-perovskite constitues most of Earth's lower mantle, making it the most abundant mineral in Earth. It turns out that when aluminium (Al3+) substitutes into the perovskite structure, it is energetically very favorable for it to couple itself with an Fe3+ cation to achieve charge balance. This substitution reaction apparently operates even at reducing conditions like during core segregation. Apparently, the source of the Fe3+ is provided by an auto-oxidation-reduction reaction in perovskite: 3FeO = Fe2O3 + Fe (metal) This simple FeO disproportionation reaction has far reaching implications. If this reaction operated during core formation, then some of the disproprtionated metal may have been removed from the mantle when large diapirs of accretionary material made their way to the core. In this case, the mantle would become progressively oxidized. Not only does this crystal-chemical mechanism provide a solution to the oxidation puzzle, but it apparently can satisfy long standing paradoxes concerning the siderophile and isotopic composition of the mantle as well. This model needs further testing. The auto-oxidation reaction has only been observed at pressures of the shallowest part of the lower mantle. The fundamental question addressed in this proposal is how pressure affects the energetic competition among the various Al and Fe substitution mechanisms in perovskite. If alumina can substitute differently at high pressures without the need for Fe3+, the auto-oxidation mechanism would shut down. Here, we propose an experimental study with the primary objective of determining if this important FeO disproportionation reaction occurs at pressures throughout the lower mantle.
- NERC Reference:
- NE/E00475X/1
- Grant Stage:
- Completed
- Scheme:
- Standard Grant (FEC)
- Grant Status:
- Closed
- Programme:
- Standard Grant
This grant award has a total value of £315,287
FDAB - Financial Details (Award breakdown by headings)
| DI - Other Costs | Indirect - Indirect Costs | DA - Investigators | DA - Estate Costs | DI - Equipment | DI - Staff | DI - T&S | DA - Other Directly Allocated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £29,410 | £109,785 | £28,959 | £41,084 | £12,220 | £73,226 | £14,286 | £6,316 |
If you need further help, please read the user guide.